The Empire's New Clothes By Frederick Luis Aldama

I read with great enthusiasm Timothy Brennan's timely, and informative essay, "The Empire's New Clothes" (Critical Inquiry. Vol. 29, no. 2, 2003). First, Brennan's essay on Negri and Hardt's academic best-selling Empire leaves almost no stone unturned. He shows how these two alchemists use their best rhetorical shots to persuade their readers that the fight against capitalism and all its monstrous consequences is no longer necessary because capitalism--as Brennan phrases it--has already provided us with an "inchoate communism."

Crafting against the Grain: an Interview with Zulfikar Ghose

With the publication of eleven beautifully crafted, stylistically varied novels, five collections of poetry, several works of criticism on Shakespeare and writing, and an autobiography, Zulfikar Ghose is one of our late-twentieth century's great and prolific writers.

Why Study Chicano/a Music? By Frederick Luis Aldama

After receiving an interesting, though not very constructive review of my essay, "Frontera Musicscapes: Grinding Up a Bad Edge in Borderland Studies", I take the opportunity to think about the purpose of studying music (borderland or otherwise).

Troubled times: A Conceptual Approach to Understanding Barbarism

ON CONCEPTS. A concept is a mental representation of a class of objects in the world. It is the "glue that holds our mental world together", according to Gregory L. Murphy.

Michael Nava: tooth and nail survival

In 1986 Michael Nava published his first mystery novel, "The Little Death," breathing life into the first gay Chicano lawyer-as-detective, Henry Rios. Michael Nava hasn't stopped to look back since, churning out seven more award-winning novels that fully contour Rios's life as he solves grisly murders and crimes against the disenfranchised, has affairs of the heart, and struggles to survive in a xenophobic, heterosexist world. I met with the gracious, soft spoken, clean-cut Michael Nava at his office in San Franciso. With penal code books lying heavy on the desk, milagros hanging on the wall, and Giants paraphernalia filling up shelves, Nava and I discussed his life and fiction.

Interview with Jose Latour

Known in Cuba for his crime novels and as the vice president of the Latin American division of the International Association of Crime Writers, José Latour makes his English-language, U.S.-published debut with "Outcast."

The Empire's New Clothes By Frederick Luis Aldama


FONT SIZE: BIGGER  |  SMALLER  |   DOWNLOAD AS RTF DOCUMENT
Last updated: 05-Mar-2004  |  Author: Frederick Luis Aldama

I read with great enthusiasm Timothy Brennan's timely, and informative essay, "The Empire's New Clothes" (Critical Inquiry. Vol. 29, no. 2, 2003).  First, Brennan's essay on Negri and Hardt's academic best-selling Empire leaves almost no stone unturned.  He shows how these two alchemists use their best rhetorical shots to persuade their readers that the fight against capitalism and all its monstrous consequences is no longer necessary because capitalism--as Brennan phrases it--has already provided us with an "inchoate communism."

Indeed, Hardt and Negri share much in common with others such as Louis Althusser, Michel Foucault, Jacques Lacan, Maurice Blanchot, Georges Bataille, Michel de Certeau, Carl Schmitt, Paul Ricoeur, Félix Guattari, Gilles Deleuze, and of course, the gurus of all gurus, Friedrich Nietzsche, Hans Georg Gadamer, and Martin Heidegger.  That is, they all share a profound aversion toward the working class; they are all deeply contemptuous of the many attempts the workers have made the world over since the 19th-century to build their own organizations as weapons to fight capitalism and overthrow it, and they all blame the proletariat for the defeats it has suffered up to now.  Nietzsche's aristocratism; Blanchot's, Gadamer's, Schmitt's, and Heidegger's Naziphilia; Bataille's dark mysticism and fascistic leanings; Guattari, Deleuze's, and Lacan's abhorence to science while saturating their writings with puns, portmanteau words, and neologisms based on scientific terms; Foucault's, Negri/Hardt's ultra-leftism that in fact aspires to a perpetuation of capitalism; and Althusser's aim to defend both the Stalinist bureaucracy and the capitalist regime worldwide-- all this and more have been and still are among the most effective ideological weapons that the ruling classes have used to keep one generation after another of young students away from the knowledge that may lead them to join the emancipation struggle of the working-class populations.

It is odd that many scholars in humanities departments across the country continue to believe that they are furthering the cause of freedom from exploitation, oppression, and discrimination by teaching those authors and basing their own writings on the teachings of those authors. It's the world upside down.  Thanks to Brennan and a handful of other scholars, this is now changing.

Finally, Brennan's essay is valuable and so particularly timely precisely because it attends to the very pressing need to clear up things and mop up all the mess in the humanities generally.  One could wish that there would be more scholars like Brennan--including also sociologists, economists, historians, and so on--that would look deeply into the causes of academia's infatuation with the magical, mystical, deceiving, disjointed, vague, openly mistaken and misguiding, muddled, obscure and obscurantist thinking coming from the several dozen authors whose work seems to have become mandatory reading in the humanities and social sciences departments of our universities.
Frederick Luis Aldama


Total views: 2,485
 
wonderstore developments evolved this site